|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT
|
|
AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT AKT
|
|
Allgemeine Kosmos-Theorie |
|
AKT |
|
AKT |
|
akt2-1 |
|
Physics - Development |
|
explaining nature as a oneness |
|
Quantum physics - Macrophysics |
|
AKT |
|
Written for normal people, interested in theoretical physics.
Micro-Cosmos, Macro-Cosmos
Question and Answer
Issue: AKT, Allgemeine Kosmos-Theorie
Part 2 (26.6.2013)
A series of observations can be made in regard to bh’s, giving information over the movements of the bh in its spouting time, some 106 until 109 years ago: the axis of a normal bh is rotating a bit, while ejecting bulk mass into space. Therefore we see, that the outcome of the ejection-arms, after some 106 years, the pearl chain of stars, don’t form a straight line, but a beautiful curved line. Many young galaxies have two slightly curved arms, indicating, that their origin, the shooting bh, rotated a bit while ejecting matter. Furthermore we can discover some galaxies, where the two arms wind around the central bh 2 or 3 times indicating that this bh rotated a lot more in its spewing time. Conclusion: The rotation speed of the axis is variable. But what about the rotation speed of the bh itself around its axis? What about its moment? Clearly the pressure difference in a bh with greater rotation speed is greater, so it will earlier begin to spout matter. A bh with slow spin will later begin to eject matter into space. And a bh without spin? When will it begin to spout? A predetermined spout-mouth doesn’t exist.
We can guess that it will go on growing, getting bigger than ‘normal’ bh’s. Under the increasing pressure of G.A (=Gravitation-attraction) gunpowder G.R (representing Gravitation-Repulsion) is produced, but there is no gunbarrel to shoot. Finally, all nucleons are pressed together to n-nucleons, governed by G.A, strong enough to do so. No n-nucleon can escape from the pressure-bottle present. Bubbles, boiling up inside, are repressed easily again. And the bh goes on swallowing swarms of stars, goes on growing. Suddendy then it begins to shrink to a much smaller ball: the n-nucleons collapse to nn-nucleons, again 5000 times smaller than n-nucleons, representing G.R3-gunpowder, 4000 or 5000 times stronger than G.R2-gunpowder (n-nucleons). The bh can go on growing in mass. How far? That depends upon the balance-ratio between G.A and G.Rx As long as G.A governs G.Rx, stopping each trial of matter to escape, the grow process can go on. If a further galaxy falls into the supermassive bh in such a way, that the super-heavy ball begins to spin, an escape door opens and a new and bigger cosmic rifle-fire can start, creating a cluster of smaller bh’s as short interim state and as result of these a cluster of galaxies in place of one galaxy alone. Over how many steps the process can go down until it reaches the basis? Experimental physics must determine that. I have asked top-physicists, Nobel-laureates included. “How many levels in matter-structure do exist?” The answer was always: “We don’t know.”
When the growing process goes on and reaches the basis, a point must come, where the balance-mark shifts to the side of G.Rx. The bh gets instable. Then a tiny shock of an intruding mass can launch the greatest explosion possible, big and small pieces of the super-heavy ball sparking in all directions. In the chaotic eruption the pieces of super-dense matter get moments, flying away with more or less spin. The big bh is broken down into smaller bh’s, flying with different spins in all directions, getting more and more ball-form because of G.A. The pieces from the outer layers of the erupting big ball shoot away with utmost velocity, the pieces of the next layers follow a bit slower: the typical processes in an explosion, because the deeper explosions have to work against the retarding pressure of the first explosion-waves in the outer regions. The only difference between a normal explosion, which we can experience here on earth, and this big bang is, that each piece, broken out of the big bh and shot into space by the cosmic explosion, is doomed to become a galaxy, smaller piece, smaller galaxy, bigger piece, bigger galaxy. Dependant upon the density of the broken pieces, consisting of nnnnn- nucleons (n5-nucleons) or nnnn-nucleons (n4-nucleons), consisting of nx-nucleons or nx-1-nucleons, it can even be, that the bh’s, shot away by the biggest possible bh, begin to shoot away bh’s themselves, bh’s of lesser density, ny-1 in place of ny, in the same way as cluster-bombs eject small bombs. The last generation in the serie is a galaxy. The outer layers of pieces / layers of ld-bh’s (ld-bh = less dense bh) / layers of galaxies, are running away with the greatest speed, the pieces out of the next layer are running away with a bit less speed, the pieces out of the again deeper layer are travelling again with less speed. So all galaxies dissipate with speed from each other. That is precisely that, what the astronomer Sandgate has discovered in 1965, when watching a cluster of 10.000 galaxies. That led to a series of theories, the Big Bang included. On the background of the AKT-astronomy it is now simple to predict: precision measurements of the galaxy-movements will show, that they move away from each other not accelerated, but braked by Gravity G.A. In some 109 years they will fall against each other and finally will stream together in the place of the original explosion to form there another super-bh, which again will explode. The BIG-Bang-Fether will go on oscillating.
Very special is, that the huge BIG-BANG-Fether, extending/contracting over a space volume of millions of light years, with an oscillation time of some 109 years, is driven by mini-fethers, extending/contracting on nucleon- and sub-nucleon-scale, extending/collapsing in no time (<10-6 seconds), releasing/swallowing intense energy amounts. The accelleration of the stuff of later galaxies is taking place in the rifle-barrel of the bh only (that may be 1000 km) by contributions of many mini-fethers. Sure we can speak of an unsymetric pair of forces, gravitation-attraction G.A and gravitation-repulsion G.Rx.
Astronomers are watching objects in the sky, collecting observations, binding observations together by theories, f.i. the big-bang-theory. Special objects in the sky, black holes, short ago still nearly invisible (but now visible via Chandra (x-ray), Spitzer (infra-red) and Hubble (visible wavelength) in combination), didn’t play a big role in their theories. Only the role of a grave for stuff.
The new theory AKT affirms the big-bang-theory widely, elaborates this theory by giving bh’s a central role in the processes. A big-bang-explosion is an explosion of a supermassive bh without spin. Steps between are possible in AKT, where bh’s with spin, having swallowed star clusters, don’t explode, but start shooting matter into space through the spin-axis, composing galaxy-planes. Doing so they burn out and shrink to 0.5 % of the galaxy-mass, then rest in the middle of the galaxy, waiting for the return of their children. Such smaler bh-galaxy-systems could oscillate eternally, but seem to be part of a greater game, the big-bang-game. The bh-galaxy-systems seem to dissipate over space in phase 1, to fall back by G.A and to unite again in a supermassive bh. A big fether, composed of elements, which are fethers in themselves!
Space has no limit. Behind the horizon of Hubble can dawn a new world of stars, of galaxies, of bh’s and of super-bh’s of the greatest category possible. Or is there only one matter-centrum in the universe? Can we, on the background of our poor empirical knowledge (Hubble, Chandra, Spitzer-telescopes available since 20 years, not since 200 years, not since 2000 years) find an answer to this question?
Astronomers are watching galaxies colliding. In special cases that could indicate 2 big-bangs of the ultimate kind, explosions of super-bh’s. We know, that the pieces from a super-bh-explosion dissipate over space in phase 1. In this phase 1 they cannot collide. If pieces/galaxies do, they come from 2 explosions, with great probability. Only at the end of phase 2 they can collide and will collide in the place of the earlier explosion. Thus: we have to investigate the cosmic environment of a collision. In phase 1 there is one exception; collision of galaxies is possible, when they are the results of 2 small bombs of a cluster-bomb. The probability is small, but such a collision is theoretically possible. That has to be investigated.
While most bh’s are found in the centers of galaxies, a group of researches detected 7 bh’s without galaxy. That indicates that a bh can have swallowed 98% of its gallaxy and can be waiting for the last 2% to begin to burn, to eject matter via its spin axis. Thus we would advice to watch these bh’s carefully in order not to miss the start of the outbreak of the cosmic rifle-fire. In a lot of cases a bh, having still a visible rest of the collapsing galaxy in its near environment, will start already burning, because fat enough. But sure there are cases, where a bh needs the last 2% to get fat enough.
Via Chandra, Spitzer and Hubble bh’s are visible today. Small wonder, that astronomers, busy with bh-detection and observation, come to believe, that bh’s may have a function inside star systems. Until short astronomers thought: “Bh’s are exotic guests in star clusters, more or less incidently present there.” This point of view begins to change.
Roeland Van Der Marel of the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore states: "Black holes are even more common in the universe than previously thought." “A black hole's mass is proportional to the mass of the stellar environment it inhabits. Supermassive black holes found by Hubble in the centers of galaxies represent about 0.5 percent of the galaxies' mass.” reports Michael Rich of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). And he adds: “It appears that there is some yet-to-be-discovered underlying process that ties a black hole to its host in a fundamental way. Nature is providing a big clue as to how these systems and their black holes form. The developing AKT-astronomy is since Dec. 2012 present on the Website AKT.jaaaa.net and not yet known to much people. It would be interesting to hear the judgement of bh-researchers as Michael Rich and Roeland Van Der Marel and their researcher-teams over AKT. Publication via Internet-radiostation Scitechtalk may attribute to lay connections to interested researchers. On Internet galleries of galaxy-photo’s can be found, and galleries of black hole photos, shot via Chandra (x-ray wavelength) Here a list (is completed) : www.astronomie.de ESO.org Astronomy.com www.skyandtelescope.com A gallery of 15 galaxy– and black-holes-photo’s can be studied there, accompanied by text. The underlined citations are taken from there. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/12/05/supermassive_black_holes/
End akt2-1 ————— more . |